The Conduct of;
the Victorian Anti Corruption Commission “IBAC”
and the ultimate overseer,
The Victorian Inspectorate.
***************
With corruption well entrenched in Victoria and with Victoria about a thousand years behind the other states in addressing corruption the Victorian Parliament created the toothless tiger pussycat entitled the “Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission”, “IBAC”.
The fact that it is toothless and useless has been well commented upon and I leave my readers to google the numerous articles on the subject.
Even worse however is that in my experience, detailed below, on the face of it the IBAC failed and refused to do its duty and may itself be corrupt.
(Late news: As discussed below the commissioner of IBAC refused to investigate clear and unequivocal evidence of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by professional associates of the commissioner but recently the IBAC took on its “most important inquiry to date” and investigates extreme underlings taking free travel and other minor benefits. see newspaper article. 20/10/14)
Details;
The fact that that there is abundant evidence that Major General, Justice Greg Garde and Justice Robert Osborn and their co-conspirators have acted exactly as described by me is beyond reasonable dispute and I refer my readers to the videos and material set out elsewhere in this website for the fact of that unequivocal evidence.
This website has gone through a number of iterations. Previous iterations have consisted of extensive, very detailed, writings on the relevant material some of which has now been condensed into video form and some of which has been published in bound hard copy version and forwarded to the Chief Justice and other relevant persons as detailed elsewhere on this website.
By letter dated 12th June 2013 I made complaint to the IBAC and I made allegations as to the various things set out on this website and I referred the commission to this website for details.
That letter contained specific allegations as to;
the matters and things set out in the video entitled “Justice Greg Garde and Jim Delany SC Fraudsters Conspirators“; and;
that Justice Robert Osborn had fabricated Reasons for Judgment to conceal and deny those things; and;
that Justice Robert Osborn had fabricated orders and Authenticated Order documents as detailed in the video entitled “Justice Robert Osborn. Fabricated Orders and Authenticated Order Documents.”; and;
- the conduct of the court of appeal and the other things set out in this website.
In the face of its legislative duty to investigate instances of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice the IBAC refused to investigate and said that the matters alleged by me were not of the type or seriousness to warrant investigation. (see IBAC letter to me)
In that letter the IBAC did not specify why the things alleged by me were not of the type or seriousness sufficient to warrant investigation however after persistent inquiry by me I was informed that the Commissioner himself had dismissed my compaint (purportedly) pursuant to s.63 of the IBAC legislation.
Stephen O’Bryan QC. – IBAC Comissioner
s.63 of the IBAC legislation, quite properly, mandates that the IBAC must not investigate a complaint which DIRECTLY RELATES to the MERITS of a decision or order or judgment of a judicial officer complained about.
Now, I say that it is manifest that my allegations about the conspiracy of Garde to pervert the course of justice, as detailed in the abovementioned video, cannot be construed to DIRECTLY RELATE to the MERITS of decision. If that were the case anyone could lie to or bribe a judge with absolute impunity.
I also say that the question as to whether or not a Judge fraudulently fabricates Reasons for Judgment for a friend or because he was bribed cannot be construed to DIRECTLY RELATE to the MERITS of decision. That is an utter nonsense.
The simple fact is that the commissioner was adequately aware of all of the matters and things set out on this website and he used s.63 of the IBAC legislation to avoid investigating them.
I also note that if my allegations were baseless the Attorney General and Stephen Lee would have no need to resort to the conduct detailed on the present home page to conceal them.
I referred the conduct of the IBAC to the Victorian Inspectorate and the Victorian Inspectorate refused to do anything and refused to communicate further. (see chain of communicaton Letter 1, Letter 2, Letter 3, Letter 4.)
I conclude that the IBAC was fixed with knowledge of evidence of corruption which it was required to investigate and it refused to do so and misinterpreted the legislation in support of that refusal.
I also conclude that the Victorian Inspectorate was aware of the wrongful conduct of IBAC and did nothing.
It appears to me that the conduct of the IBAC and the Inspectorate is entirely consistent with the conduct of the Attorney General.
************************
The Age Newspaper of April 16th 2014 reported in IBAC’s official report and said;
At merely 29 pages in length, and of little substance, the report reads like a satire; like it might have been scripted for the BBC’s Yes Minister or The Thick of It series.
The report reveals that under names such as operations Hydrogen, Toucan, Plyers and Herbert, Victoria’s elite corruption fighters spent the year investigating an alleged police assault, alleged back-handers at a rural council, alleged bribes over cemetery plots, police handling of internal bullying, and racist stubby holders at a police social club.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/ibac-admits-it-cannot-do-its-job-20140415-36pv9.html#ixzz3HBFW2OKw
So in other words the commissoner investigated stubby holders but refused to investigate unequivocal evidence of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by fellow barristers.
The IBAC was aware of the matters in these videos and much more and the commissioner refused to investigate.