In 2005 Major General Greg Garde QC (now Justice Greg Garde) and Jim Delany SC conspired with one another and with their respective junior barristers and instructing solicitors to pervert the course of justice and wrongfully obtain a wrongful judgment of the Supreme Court of Victoria.
That hearing was before Master Efthim (now Associate Justice Efthim). At that hearing I was represented by Mr. John Middleton QC, (now Justice Middleton of the Federal Court.)
I appealed the Orders of Master Efthim and the appeal came on before “The Honourable” Justice Robert Osborn. Middleton refused to appear and explain his part in the conduct which had occurred. As a consequence I represented myself at the appeal and put the facts of the corrupt conduct, as I then understood it, which had occurred before Master Efthim.
“The Honourable” Justice Robert Osborn then corruptly fabricated Reasons for Judgment which overtly and manifestly and completely fly in the face of the facts and the law in a very carefully coordinated manner and which were fabricated by him for the purpose of ignoring, denying and concealing the corrupt conduct which had occurred before Master Efthim and which was repeated before him and for the further purpose of corruptly upholding and providing verisimilitude to the fatally flawed reasons and orders of Master Efthim which had resulted from that corrupt conduct.
In a subsequent written submissions to Osborn, amongst other things, I told him to his face;
“(2) As a matter of demonstrable fact your substantive reasons for Judgement are manifestly wrong and without any basis in fact or reason“
“(17) The plaintiffs place on record that they are seriously concerned and disturbed by your Honour’s reasons for judgement and the facts and circumstances surrounding that judgement and the circumstances of the conduct of the hearing of the appeal by your Honour” (a copy of the submisson is available on the “Fraudulent Authenticated Orders” section; Chapter 1 part 5)
I attached a number of exhibits to that written submission, those exhibits unequivocally demonstrated the falsety of Osborn’s fabricated reasons.
This website extensively sets out the matters facts and things known to and before Osborn at the time that he fraudulently fabricated his Reasons for Judgment.
This website explicitly demonstrates that Osborn overtly fabricated his Reasons in the face of the facts and the law; it demonstrates that he fabricated whatever was necessary to give effect to his abovedescribed ulterior purpose and motive.
The material on this website is not an easy read, most serious issues are adressed and extensive documentation provided. I am however in the process of writing an easy reading version which will become available as a menu option.
Hard evidence — upfront and between the eyes;
At paragraph 115 of his Reasons for Judgment dated 29th November 2006 Justice Robert Osborn said;
As I have already noted the amended statement of claim served in the Tylden County Court proceeding expressly alleged
(c) The firstnamed defendant did not serve or cause to be served any or any proper requirements with respect to the making of such roads. (my emphasis)
This paragraph along with each and every substantive paragraph published by Osborn was overtly false and in the face of the facts. The truth known to Osborn was that paragraph 7 of that Amended Statement of Claim unequivocally alleged service of a Notice of Requirement in respect of construction of roads and water works. (the following is a true copy of paragraph 7 of that Amended Statement of Claim)
Nothing in that Amended Statement of Claim alleged or implied as corruptly asserted by Osborn.
The numerous carefully coordinated fabrications by Osborn were overt, manifest, obvious, unequivocal. The above is merely an example, his entire substantive Reasons are as manifestly false as the foregoing.
Osborn’s Reasons were fabricated by him in the privacy of wherever he secludes himself and in the face of the hard evidence before him and in the complete absence of submissions or evidence to the effect of his substantive Reasons. Osborn simply concocted, fabricated, invented his corruptly counterfeited Reasons for Judgment.
I then appealed to the Victorian Court of Appeal, the grounds for that appeal were the corrupt conduct of Garde and Delany and Co and the subsequent corrupt conduct of “The Honourable” Justice Robert Osborn.
In the Court of Appeal, Garde and Delany and Co corruptly relied on the Judgments of Master Efthim and of Osborn while knowing full well that those Judgments had been obtained by them in the circumstances alluded to above.
During the course of my appeal to the Court of Appeal; as unequivocally detailed at Chapter 1 part 5, the Court itself became involved by fraudulently fabricating “Authenticated Order” documents the apparent intended effect and certainly known effect of which was to suppress my appeal by rendering it imvalid.
In the Court of Appeal sufficient detail of the corrupt conduct of the lawyers and of Osborn was before each of Justices, Beach, Buchanan, Neave, Mandy and Redlich for them to conclude that my allegations as to corrupt conduct were not unfounded.
Justice Buchanan said to the effect “There is nothing in the Authenticated Orders“
Justices Redlich and Beach said; “He makes a number of serious allegations concerning the trial judge and the legal representatives …… No material has been advanced by written or oral submissions which might on any view support these allegations“; and;
- Justices Neave and Mandy said; “Nor is it necessary to take into account any unfounded and scandalous allegations made in relation to the Court itself
It had become apparent that Court, including the Court of Appeal, was corrupt at least to the extent that it would pervert itself and the course of justice rather than expose the conduct of Osborn or admit the corrupt conduct of lawyers such as Major General Greg Garde QC (now Justice Greg Garde) who mislead the courts with an obvious sense of immunity and impunity.
I told the Court of Appeal it was not an honest place and that I had reserved the web domain name “Courtsontrial com” for the purpose of publicly exposing the conduct of the Court and its officers and that I had already thrown away close to one million dollars in cash and that I was abandoning my appeal rather than throw away even more.